Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Padma,
At 06:38 PM 07-10-2017, Padma Pillay-Esnault wrote:
Not sure if you have been following the discussions the last few days and emails today. The charter which is under review is not trying to create an embedded identifier to track users.

I caught up with the thread about this proposed working group. The (proposed) charter might say that it is not trying to create an embedded identifier to track users. What if that was a side effect of this work?

I took a look at the ideas problem statement draft. I can understand that there may be a need for identification. However, it is up to the companies or 501(c)(3) status organizations to make their case for that.

Will this proposed working group do any maintenance work on IPv4 technical specifications? Will the output of this proposed working group be used for future work on IPv4 technical specifications?

The draft in question is being updated and the authors are doing for clarification.

Ok.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]