Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Exactly!

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> en nombre de S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Responder a: <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fecha: miércoles, 1 de noviembre de 2017, 10:35
Para: <jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Asunto: Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement

    Hi Jordi,
    At 01:13 AM 01-11-2017, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    >No, what I'm arguing is that ISOC trust .CAT folks and not having 
    >talked with the other Spanish ISOC chapters to verify it, instead of 
    >going to read the court order.
    >
    >My point here is not the Catalonia problem, is a general statement 
    >to make in the ISOC "rules" that ISOC MUST not interfere with court 
    >orders, unless they can verify what is being said at the court order.
    >
    >In this case, the court order indicated a list of very specific 
    >unlawful sites, but ISOC published that it was a global order to 
    >.cat to ban any political sites. It is a big difference. Our 
    >constitution doesn't enable splitting the country and consequently
    
    As I see it, something went wrong [1].  What you are asking is for 
    the Internet Society's Board of Trustee to set a policy so that the 
    Internet Society does not make any statement related to a country 
    without verifying the facts.
    
    Regards,
    S. Moonesamy
    
    1. The word "wrong" is used for simplicity instead of accuracy. 
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]