Either we accept that democratic countries with split power take legitimate decisions or ISOC never comments on law orders. Easy just pick one.
In any case, if ISOC want to comment a court order, they must have a copy of it so they know what they are talking about, which was not the case as I explained several times, and this is an unlawful act.
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Responder a: <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fecha: lunes, 30 de octubre de 2017, 23:48
Para: "jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: "<ietf@xxxxxxxx>" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Asunto: Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
On Oct 30, 2017, at 6:39 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> NEVER AGAIN ISOC/staff can repeat that problem. ISOC MUST defend freedom of expression in Internet, but not by means of untrue statements against legitimate court orders.
Who gets to decide what is untrue or legitimate?
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.