Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:31:38 +0200
In-reply-to: <dd2c3bd5-dd37-109b-2e81-0327db4daa09@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <150670160872.14128.2758037992338326085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <778d5504-ba4f-d418-7b20-356353bb0fb2@cs.tcd.ie> <CAMm+Lwg61PGrcmu=-e8ciD6Q+XmEaWWDys4g2M657VOjWmaGcg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S370-TuoUicWep5vV2NjLPS4d-HP1qVxW_nGrxhBLw6Eug@mail.gmail.com> <8kd5pq.oxb4pv.rtlo8t-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EAA7204@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <dd2c3bd5-dd37-109b-2e81-0327db4daa09@cs.tcd.ie>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0


On 2017-10-04 21:45, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> That really wasn't a good example;-)

yeah thats not how phishing works

References:
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Tom Herbert
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: stephen . farrell
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Alexander Clemm
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Stephen Farrell