Hi Russ, On 10/30/17 2:19 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > Alia: > > The SIDR WG wanted to reference rsync, but there was no stable reference that described the protocol, only the code. A document was written to specify the rsync URL, and they is the only thing that is normatively referenced. A reference to the protocol would be better, and I hope this BCP would allow that to happen in the future. When you say, “the protocol”, to what are you referring? > > Section 2 is written as a list of questions. In some cases it is unclear to me which answer to the question makes an acceptable normative reference. A list of requirements would be more clear. I think that's a fair point, but for a -00 the questions seem like a good place to start. Maybe you even have some ideas as to what good answers should be. Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature