Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/7/17, 12:10 PM, "Keith Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Nov 7, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Lee Howard <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Another form of corporate surveillance is monitoring your employees’ use
>> of your corporate resources. I hope we don’t collectively object to
>>that.
>
>That's also a heinous practice, along with drug testing, demanding
>employees' social media credentials, etc.

I disagree. If I’m paying someone to use my computer to communicate my
data on my network, it’s mine. You don’t get a say in it.

More to the point: I don’t recall an ISOC opinion on this topic, or the
identical situation of parental supervision. Also, I’d appreciate a
pointer to the IETF consensus statement on the topic, if there is one.

Even more to the point: nuanced position statements don’t belong in the
mission statement. 

Lee






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]