Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement

[henry <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Your employee is best viewed as a contracted sovereign labor, with right to liberty to engage in private and protected communications over the contractual equipment and service allocation to support your labor. Just as if it were an automobile, she will stop to get groceries and drive her kids to soccer, in the company car.

Same difference without nuance. Yes, allegorical category...

Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:04, Lee Howard <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11/7/17, 12:10 PM, "Keith Moore" wrote: > > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 7, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Lee Howard wrote: >> >> Another form of corporate surveillance is monitoring your employees’ use >> of your corporate resources. I hope we don’t collectively object to >>that. > >That's also a heinous practice, along with drug testing, demanding >employees' social media credentials, etc. I disagree. If I’m paying someone to use my computer to communicate my data on my network, it’s mine. You don’t get a say in it. More to the point: I don’t recall an ISOC opinion on this topic, or the identical situation of parental supervision. Also, I’d appreciate a pointer to the IETF consensus statement on the topic, if there is one. Even more to the point: nuanced position statements don’t belong in the mission statement. Lee