You're the one arguing for spying on your employees. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 7, 2017, at 12:19 PM, Lee Howard <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 11/7/17, 1:08 PM, "Keith Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Nov 7, 2017, at 11:04 AM, Lee Howard <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 11/7/17, 12:10 PM, "Keith Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On Nov 7, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Lee Howard <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Another form of corporate surveillance is monitoring your employees’ >>>>> use >>>>> of your corporate resources. I hope we don’t collectively object to >>>>> that. >>>> >>>> That's also a heinous practice, along with drug testing, demanding >>>> employees' social media credentials, etc. >>> >>> I disagree. If I’m paying someone to use my computer to communicate my >>> data on my network, it’s mine. You don’t get a say in it. >> >> I suppose you have their houses searched too? > > Well, in my child’s case, I most certainly do. > > In the business case, not unless I paid for the house, the network, the > work they’re doing there, and the devices they’re doing it on. > > If you walk out of my office carrying a large box, I certainly have the > right to check what’s inside it. If you send email out of my office > servers with a large attachment, I have the right to check what’s inside. > > What’s confusing about this concept? How is this even contentious? And how > can we bring it back around to the actual topic of conversation? > > > Lee > >