Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Farmer writes:
 > I would prefer a normative RECOMMENDED, the rest of the sentence in
 > RFC2119, just means you should explain the constraints on the alternatives.
 > How about something like this;
 > 
 > "The LOCAL_PREF value SHOULD be lower than any of the alternative
 > paths.  A LOCAL_PREF
 > value of Zero is RECOMMENDED, however any LOCAL_PREF value lower than all
 > other LOCAL_PREF values used within an AS is an acceptable alternative.
 > The LOCAL_PREF value used, Zero or otherwise, SHOULD NOT also
 > have another use or meaning within the AS."
 > 


The LOCAL_PREF choice here is a simple thing -- don't make it more
complicated than it needs to be.

Job's suggested text says all that's necessary:

    "The LOCAL_PREF value SHOULD be lower than any of the alternative
    paths.  Zero being the lowest value, it MAY be used whichever
    LOCAL_PREF values are used by the AS."


Thanks.

						Jay B.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]