Re: End Work on IPv4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



gerontology4, geriatrics4 ?

Kidding aside: why should that work not be done via  sunset4 (modify charter) ?
There is a whole world of venture capitalists specialising in maximizing
business opportunities from sunset industries/technologies. As long as we define 
better than sunset4 != kill4 i would still prefer to express the fact
that the goal of the group is different from eg: 6man.

Cheers
    Toerless

On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 05:21:51AM -0700, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/5/2017 1:24 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
> > Perhaps we should be creating a 4man WG, for ???IPv4 Maintenance???...
> >
> > Tim
> 
> If there becomes enough work to warrant a separate WG, perhaps. Until
> then, INTAREA has been sufficient
> 
> Joe




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]