Hi Andrew,
At 02:34 PM 29-10-2017, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
If we're going to have this conversation here, rather than in an
ISOC-dedicated forum (and I confess I am very much unsure why we
should do that), then perhaps saying something apart from "I don't
Ok.
think that's so good," would be worth doing. What _would_ be good,
what would meet your expectations, and so on? That is, give the
reader some reason to think that the evaluation is anything other than
personal taste. For example, I think bananas are not that good (they
gross me out), but that doesn't mean the banana people are doing
something wrong.
I do not have any expectations. My last comment about the matter in
an IETF venue was on 10 October 2013. My only comment about the
matter outside the IETF was around 11 months ago; the reason for that
is because I was in the room where ISOC was having the
discussion. My opinion is based on a reading of the discussions on
ietf@xxxxxxxx over an extended period of time; it is a subjective way
to assess IETF participation. I haven't looked at the recent
statistics for attendance. My guess is that it is around 1% for the
region. I am okay if the reader believes that the opinion is a
matter of personal taste.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy