Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andy Bierman <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:48:12 +0000
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>, "draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis.all@xxxxxxxx" <draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis.all@xxxxxxxx>, IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, Netconf <netconf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CABCOCHSeH8p+8cmwWeM5YNKgt88G9jVRiLYYMkKUciq-1vQUwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150887043755.25125.4101359471995987191@ietfa.amsl.com> <FE9443FA-4DD8-4368-8320-124F8FF25F2D@gmail.com> <CABCOCHSeH8p+8cmwWeM5YNKgt88G9jVRiLYYMkKUciq-1vQUwQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309

> Actually the term "leafs" is used 31 times in RFC 7950.

> The term "leaves" is used zero times.

> I think the same is true in all existing YANG-related RFCs.

Agreed. I always see "leafs". I don't think we should change this.

K. // contributor

References:
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
  - From: Stewart Bryant
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
  - From: Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
  - From: Andy Bierman

Prev by Date: Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
Next by Date: Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07
Previous by thread: Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
Next by thread: Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]