Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

To: Tom Herbert <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 15:37:37 -0700
Cc: "ideas@xxxxxxxx" <ideas@xxxxxxxx>, "phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx, lisp@xxxxxxxx, Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CALx6S35Jyvx2G-fPLUbfSM=P=ykveBrDuq_hAuU-4LmmCA0MkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150670160872.14128.2758037992338326085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <778d5504-ba4f-d418-7b20-356353bb0fb2@cs.tcd.ie> <CAMm+Lwg61PGrcmu=-e8ciD6Q+XmEaWWDys4g2M657VOjWmaGcg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S370-TuoUicWep5vV2NjLPS4d-HP1qVxW_nGrxhBLw6Eug@mail.gmail.com> <8kd5pq.oxb4pv.rtlo8t-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EAA7204@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <dd2c3bd5-dd37-109b-2e81-0327db4daa09@cs.tcd.ie> <0BA14206-DC82-49EF-A625-B2425FA396F6@gmail.com> <CALx6S34CJtrF80B-f6Z3ZU16u8L4XdYvXJ+u_agTscF8yw0P0w@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S37X46993s0vg39TWbrELhhRBWYX4foXxHU2oipgc3pBQg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S35Jyvx2G-fPLUbfSM=P=ykveBrDuq_hAuU-4LmmCA0MkQ@mail.gmail.com>

> I suggest that could be called idloc (for Identifier-Locator)

I would suggest ms-ops as in “mapping system operation”.

Dino

References:
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Tom Herbert
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: stephen . farrell
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Alexander Clemm
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  - From: Tom Herbert