RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Joel,


	>Yes, authentication is necessary to modify the entries.  (Whether one should be authenticated before reading varies from case to case.)
	>But authentication does not require a separate identity.  Exactly what it requires depends upon how the system is constructed.

IMHO, provider based AUTH is needed in lot of cases if we really want to build a solid system which enables mobility.
I responded to Jari, who is a pioneer and who helped spec out one of the best AUTH methods  & systems successfully deployed ever with his https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4187 
(but he did it for another most successful SDO, with all constructs like Pseudonyms and fast-re-auth-ids) didn't see the need for the same here.
May be as you indicated there is something missing in the charter that didn't reflect the need. 

--
Uma C.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]