> I would want to point out though that growing the IESG does have a cost, because we expect all ADs to ballot on documents, and that means additional comments and potentially discusses. And a larger IESG has a larger management overhead and establishing consensus internally may become more difficult. One possibility is to say that only one AD per area is needed. I think considering restructuring the IESG is worth discussing, if only so that we can get people from smaller organizations involved.
