On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:15 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would want to point out though that growing the IESG does have a cost, because we expect all ADs to ballot on documents, and that means additional comments and potentially discusses. And a larger IESG has a larger management overhead and establishing consensus internally may become more difficult.
One possibility is to say that only one AD per area is needed.
+1
Anyway this is what happens in reality, right?
Behcet
I think considering restructuring the IESG is worth discussing, if only so that we can get people from smaller organizations involved.
