Hi Uma,
At 10:14 AM 09-10-2017, Uma Chunduri wrote:
[Uma]: I am not sure what do you mean by "Privacy requirements
redefined". Today in
I was commenting on the text from the proposed charter. There are
one or more RFCs which discusses about privacy.
[Uma]: What's the relevance of the same here. IDEAS is not seeking
to change any type of LOC information used in ID/LOC protocols...
this is governed by ID/LOC protocol in use. It could be IPv4 or (mostly) IPv6.
IDEAS doesn't alter or won't come into
picture outside of ID/LOC protocol context.
If the IETF were to decide that it will stop doing IPv4 work except
for maintenance, should the working group be allowed to add in
support for IPv4?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy