On Nov 7, 2017, at 12:46, Christian Huitema <huitema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [I wrote:]
Yes, and the reason I used that technical phrase “contract of adhesion” there is to set down a marker observing that various arguments about the unconscionability (and therefore the unenforceability) of various standard form contract provisions commonly observed in the wild remain basically untested. I contend it would be within the ambit of ISOC to take public positions on some of those questions. |