IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Nomcom Chair for 2020-21
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-13
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-08
- From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: SM's questions about IETF mailing lists
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13
- From: Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12
- From: Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18
- From: David Schinazi via Datatracker
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Update regarding virtual interim materials
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- [Last-Call] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-13
- From: Frank Brockners via Datatracker
- Re: Update regarding virtual interim materials
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: On IETF funding from the Internet Society (was Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.)
- Re: On IETF funding from the Internet Society (was Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.)
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-03
- From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-03
- From: Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12
- From: Scott Bradner via Datatracker
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Reminder: Survey on planning for possible online IETF meetings
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-13
- From: Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Reminder: Survey on planning for possible online IETF meetings
- Re: On IETF funding from the Internet Society (was Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.)
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-09.txt> (Poll-Based Security Event Token (SET) Delivery Using HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07
- From: Brian Carpenter via Datatracker
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020 - Thank you
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: On IETF funding from the Internet Society (was Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.)
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: On IETF funding from the Internet Society (was Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.)
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: Consultation on IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
- Re: On IETF funding from the Internet Society (was Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-04
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-secevent-http-push-10
- From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
- Re: SM's questions about IETF mailing lists
- On IETF funding from the Internet Society (was Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.)
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Fwd: [72attendees] Bert Lends a Hand
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Fwd: [72attendees] Bert Lends a Hand
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-11.txt> Availability in SFC OAM (Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Framework) to Informational RFC
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-11.txt> Availability in SFC OAM (Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Framework) to Informational RFC
- From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-11.txt> Availability in SFC OAM (Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Framework) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13
- From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
- News about the Internet Society and PIR.
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM and SMTP authentication-like things
- Re: Update regarding virtual interim materials
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- recommendations for Last Call email processing (was: Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment)
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Update regarding virtual interim materials
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- SM's questions about IETF mailing lists
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-04
- From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef via Datatracker
- ICANN's Decision on Proposed PIR Transaction
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13
- From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12
- From: Rich Salz via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-capport-api-07
- From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01
- From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-11
- From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: [stir] for e.164 address, who do i blame?
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-20
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-05
- From: Tim Evens (tievens)
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM and SMTP authentication-like things
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-05
- From: Sarah Banks via Datatracker
- Re: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- RE: Protecting Copyright.
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Protecting Copyright.
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-11
- From: Shwetha Bhandari via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-05
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-05
- From: Tim Evens (tievens)
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-05
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-05
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07
- From: Theresa Enghardt via Datatracker
- Re: PSA pt 1: for better videoconferencing at home on slow links
- Re: PSA pt 1: for better videoconferencing at home on slow links
- Re: PSA pt 1: for better videoconferencing at home on slow links
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: PSA pt 1: for better videoconferencing at home on slow links
- Re: PSA pt 1: for better videoconferencing at home on slow links
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Re: Musing on SIP and SPAM
- Musing on SIP and SPAM
- PSA pt 2: better videoconferencing at home on lousy links
- Re: PSA pt 1: for better videoconferencing at home on slow links
- PSA pt 1: for better videoconferencing at home on slow links
- Re: Appeal to the IESG re WGLC of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07
- From: Kyle Rose via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-11
- From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11
- From: Mohit Sethi via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [core] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-stateless-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-token-authnz-12
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-14
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: WebRTC (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: Appeal to the IESG re WGLC of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
- RE: Appeal to the IESG re WGLC of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
- Appeal to the IESG re WGLC of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-14
- Re: Session attendance reconciliation (was "Management team")
- Re: Session attendance reconciliation (was "Management team")
- Re: Session attendance reconciliation (was "Management team")
- Re: Session attendance reconciliation (was "Management team")
- Re: Session attendance reconciliation (was "Management team")
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: Session attendance reconciliation (was "Management team")
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-14
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ice-pac-03
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-20
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-05
- From: Brian Trammell via Datatracker
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- From: Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: [arch-d] iesg: Re: Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-core-stateless-06
- From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: [arch-d] iesg: Re: Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: [arch-d] iesg: Re: Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: iesg: Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-05
- From: Tim Evens via Datatracker
- Re: [arch-d] iesg: Re: Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: [arch-d] iesg: Re: Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: iesg: Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- Re: iesg: Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: [arch-d] iesg: Re: Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: [arch-d] iesg: Re: Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: [arch-d] iesg: Re: Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: iesg: Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- iesg: Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists
- Re: Making future online meetings work (was:Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108)
- Re: Making future online meetings work (was:Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: Making future online meetings work (was:Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108)
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: Making future online meetings work (was:Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108)
- Re: Making future online meetings work (was:Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108)
- Re: "Management team"
- Re: Making future online meetings work
- "Management team"
- Re: Making future online meetings work (was:Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108)
- Re: Making future online meetings work (was:Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108)
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Making future online meetings work (was:Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108)
- Making future online meetings work (was:Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108)
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- RE: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Presentations are bad (Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report)
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Presentations are bad (Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report)
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Presentations are bad (Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report)
- Re: Presentations are bad (Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report)
- Re: Presentations are bad (Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-05
- Re: Usefulness of presentations [Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report]
- Re: Usefulness of presentations [Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report]
- Re: Usefulness of presentations [Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report]
- Usefulness of presentations [Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report]
- Re: Presentations are bad (Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report)
- Re: Presentations are bad (Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report)
- Usage of services without IPv6 Support
- Re: Presentations are bad (Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report)
- Presentations are bad (Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report)
- RE: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: [Last-Call] [Detnet] Last Call Comment: <draft-ietf-detnet-ip-05.txt>- ICMP support, e.g., ping and traceroute
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-14
- Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-14
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- RE: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- RE: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- RE: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- RE: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-ip-05
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call Comment: <draft-ietf-detnet-ip-05.txt>- ICMP support, e.g., ping and traceroute
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- RE: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: [Last-Call] [BULK] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-20
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: [Last-Call] [BULK] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-20
- Re: [Last-Call] [BULK] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-20
- Re: [Last-Call] [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-20
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- Re: IETF 107 Virtual Meeting Survey Report
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-16
- From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: [Last-Call] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-14
- Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- Re: [Last-Call] [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID Resource Matching
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04
- [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- From: Susan Hares via Datatracker
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: [Last-Call] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
- Re: [Last-Call] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Last-Call] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Last-Call] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
- Re: [Last-Call] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
- Re: [Last-Call] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
- Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot?
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot?
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-token-authnz-12
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-20
- From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
- Re: COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- COVID-19 contacts tracker (Re: a brief pondering)
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11
- From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-token-authnz-12
- Ballot URL when there is no ballot?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-14
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-token-authnz-12
- From: Derrell Piper via Datatracker
- What's going on in SPRING WG? (Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming)
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-11.txt> ICMP in SFC OAM (Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Framework) to Informational RFC
- From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [Ext] Re: Out for discussion: draft-leiba-ietf-iana-registrations
- Re: [Ext] Re: Out for discussion: draft-leiba-ietf-iana-registrations
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-11.txt> ICMP in SFC OAM (Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Framework) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Ext] Re: Out for discussion: draft-leiba-ietf-iana-registrations
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-11.txt> ICMP in SFC OAM (Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Framework) to Informational RFC
- From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-11.txt> Availability in SFC OAM (Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Framework) to Informational RFC
- From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-11.txt> ICMP in SFC OAM (Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Framework) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-11.txt> Availability in SFC OAM (Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Framework) to Informational RFC
- Re: Out for discussion: draft-leiba-ietf-iana-registrations
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]