Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-09.txt> (Poll-Based Security Event Token (SET) Delivery Using HTTP) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just two comments, based upon a quick read:

1. In section 2: POST is not specific to HTTP/1.1, and it's not good practice to specify a HTTP version. Just say "HTTP POST".

2. I'm not intimately familiar with the use case, but using POST in this manner precludes caching as well as fan-out (i.e., "collapsed forwarding"). Have you considered just using Atom or a similar event feed structure?

Cheers,


> On 30 Apr 2020, at 9:32 am, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Security Events WG (secevent) to
> consider the following document: - 'Poll-Based Security Event Token (SET)
> Delivery Using HTTP'
>  <draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-09.txt> as Proposed Standard
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux