Theresa, thanks for your review. John, thanks for making the changes. I entered a No Objection ballot. I understand why you removed the draft references, but it would be good to explain a little bit in the text about the code point values, even without references. Alissa > On Apr 30, 2020, at 6:00 PM, John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Alvaro, > > I’ve just uploaded -08 with your requested changes, also with the extra explanatory introduction text Theresa suggested (thanks!). > > —John > >> On Apr 30, 2020, at 6:54 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> [External Email. Be cautious of content] >> >> >> On April 26, 2020 at 4:28:18 PM, Theresa Enghardt wrote: >> >> >> Theresa: Hi! Thanks you for the review! >> >> John: Please make the changes below before the document is discussed >> by the IESG. >> >> >> Thanks!! >> >> Alvaro. >> >> >> ... >>> Regarding the code points that are now assigned as "First Come First Serve" >>> in Section 3, the document points to drafts for some of them, but not for >>> all. Is there any documentation for the code points that are currently >>> without any reference? If so, please provide a reference. If not, maybe it's >>> worth briefly stating that for some of them there is no reference and that >>> they are all deprecated, e.g., because they were used in past experiments. >> >> Yes -- for consistency they should either all include a reference >> (which is available) or not. Because of their nature, I would rather >> if all just pointed to "(this document)" to avoid confusion with >> continued work. >> >> BTW, we should also be consistent in the "prestandard" tagging: add >> the tag to the 185 entry. >> >> >>> For code point 129, a reference to a draft is provided in the "Description" >>> column, while for code point 185, a reference to a draft is provided in the >>> "Reference / Change Controller" column. Is this intentional? If not, please >>> consider unifying the presentation here. Otherwise, please consider making >>> clear why the references are in different columns. >> >> s/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/Routing Policy Distribution > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
