Hi Alvaro, I’ve just uploaded -08 with your requested changes, also with the extra explanatory introduction text Theresa suggested (thanks!). —John > On Apr 30, 2020, at 6:54 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > On April 26, 2020 at 4:28:18 PM, Theresa Enghardt wrote: > > > Theresa: Hi! Thanks you for the review! > > John: Please make the changes below before the document is discussed > by the IESG. > > > Thanks!! > > Alvaro. > > > ... >> Regarding the code points that are now assigned as "First Come First Serve" >> in Section 3, the document points to drafts for some of them, but not for >> all. Is there any documentation for the code points that are currently >> without any reference? If so, please provide a reference. If not, maybe it's >> worth briefly stating that for some of them there is no reference and that >> they are all deprecated, e.g., because they were used in past experiments. > > Yes -- for consistency they should either all include a reference > (which is available) or not. Because of their nature, I would rather > if all just pointed to "(this document)" to avoid confusion with > continued work. > > BTW, we should also be consistent in the "prestandard" tagging: add > the tag to the 185 entry. > > >> For code point 129, a reference to a draft is provided in the "Description" >> column, while for code point 185, a reference to a draft is provided in the >> "Reference / Change Controller" column. Is this intentional? If not, please >> consider unifying the presentation here. Otherwise, please consider making >> clear why the references are in different columns. > > s/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/Routing Policy Distribution -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
