On April 26, 2020 at 4:28:18 PM, Theresa Enghardt wrote: Theresa: Hi! Thanks you for the review! John: Please make the changes below before the document is discussed by the IESG. Thanks!! Alvaro. ... > Regarding the code points that are now assigned as "First Come First Serve" > in Section 3, the document points to drafts for some of them, but not for > all. Is there any documentation for the code points that are currently > without any reference? If so, please provide a reference. If not, maybe it's > worth briefly stating that for some of them there is no reference and that > they are all deprecated, e.g., because they were used in past experiments. Yes -- for consistency they should either all include a reference (which is available) or not. Because of their nature, I would rather if all just pointed to "(this document)" to avoid confusion with continued work. BTW, we should also be consistent in the "prestandard" tagging: add the tag to the 185 entry. > For code point 129, a reference to a draft is provided in the "Description" > column, while for code point 185, a reference to a draft is provided in the > "Reference / Change Controller" column. Is this intentional? If not, please > consider unifying the presentation here. Otherwise, please consider making > clear why the references are in different columns. s/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/Routing Policy Distribution -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
