Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> - Is it correct that the server type may be either one of "authentication", "authorization" or "accounting", or all of them? Is it impossible for a server to be authentication & authorization but not accounting? Such a variant cannot be configured.
>> [Bo] OK, will correct when the final guidance on this issue is received.
>
> Lada replied yesterday to say that the bit string is likely preferred similar to access-operations in ietf-netconf-acm.  I might personally discourage the use of ‘*’ for this given that there are only three types, but that’s just my individual thought.

+1

I think it is better to have all three types explicitly in the value. Perhaps this could also be the default?

Lada

>
> Joe
>

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka 
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux