> On May 28, 2020, at 6:27 PM, Robbie Harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Reviewer: Russ Housley >> Review result: Almost Ready >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by >> the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like >> any other last call comments. > > Hi Russ, thanks for the review. Changes should be present in -08 unless > discussed further below. > >> Major Concerns: >> >> Does this align with draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2? > > It's derived from it, though they no longer totally align. > >> Are you aware of https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4018/? > > I have seen it, but as Watson Ladd put it in > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/senXefqczpUZo26B35ekz8d3iLo/ > > I’m not a patent lawyer, and cannot speculate on any IPR conflicts > that may or may not exist. If these documents do not align, then another 3rd party disclosure should be made against this document, so the IPR holder can weigh in. >> Minor Concerns: >> >> Abstract: Please explain "FAST", perhaps just a pointer to RFC 6113. > > We believe this is covered by the "Document conventions" section. In my opinion, something needs to be in the Abstract. Otherwise, the Abstract is not stand alone. Russ
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
