Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On May 28, 2020, at 6:27 PM, Robbie Harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Signed PGP part >> Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Reviewer: Russ Housley >>> Review result: Almost Ready >>> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by >>> the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like >>> any other last call comments. >> >> Hi Russ, thanks for the review. Changes should be present in -08 unless >> discussed further below. >> >>> Major Concerns: >>> >>> Does this align with draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2? >> >> It's derived from it, though they no longer totally align. >> >>> Are you aware of https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4018/? >> >> I have seen it, but as Watson Ladd put it in >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/senXefqczpUZo26B35ekz8d3iLo/ >> >> I’m not a patent lawyer, and cannot speculate on any IPR conflicts >> that may or may not exist. > > If these documents do not align, then another 3rd party disclosure > should be made against this document, so the IPR holder can weigh in. Having now reread RFC 8179, it's my understanding that this is both a required action and does not indicate any further statement on our part. Accordingly, I've filed a separate IPR, though the system tells me it may take a day for it to appear. >>> Minor Concerns: >>> >>> Abstract: Please explain "FAST", perhaps just a pointer to RFC 6113. >> >> We believe this is covered by the "Document conventions" section. > > In my opinion, something needs to be in the Abstract. Otherwise, the > Abstract is not stand alone. That makes sense. If I change Second, enable the use of second factor authentication without relying on FAST. to Second, enable the use of second factor authentication without the need for a separately-established secure channel (FAST). would that address your concerns? I'd also be open to leaving out the parenthetical mention of FAST entirely if you think that's more clear. Thanks, --Robbie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
