Robbie Harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On May 28, 2020, at 6:27 PM, Robbie Harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> Reviewer: Russ Housley >>>> Review result: Almost Ready >>>> >>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >>>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by >>>> the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like >>>> any other last call comments. >>>> >>>> Minor Concerns: >>>> >>>> Abstract: Please explain "FAST", perhaps just a pointer to RFC 6113. >>> >>> We believe this is covered by the "Document conventions" section. >> >> In my opinion, something needs to be in the Abstract. Otherwise, the >> Abstract is not stand alone. > > That makes sense. If I change > > Second, enable the use of second factor authentication without > relying on FAST. > > to > > Second, enable the use of second factor authentication without the > need for a separately-established secure channel (FAST). > > would that address your concerns? I'd also be open to leaving out the > parenthetical mention of FAST entirely if you think that's more clear. I've opted to make this change, removing explicit mention of FAST entirely. It is part of -09. Thanks, --Robbie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
