Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2020-05-01 at 08:35 -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Barry,
> 
> Overall, I don’t care.
> 
> However, sending this thread to the last-call@xxxxxxxx list, seems to
> me to defeat the purpose of the last call list.   That is, it is to
> be used for IETF w.g. last calls.   Other discussions, like this one,
> should happen on the ietf@xxxxxxxx list.

well, that would exclude users like me from giving feedback, who are
happy to be on <last-call@xxxxxxxx> (for the record: "4") and are not
following <ietf@xxxxxxxx>.

I don't know how many are in my position, but I noted at least this
response from Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>:

> 4: I really like it and want to keep it.
> 
> (In fact, I unsubscribed from ietf@xxxxxxxx)

-- 
venleg helsing,
Kjetil T.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux