I don't know whether it makes the world a better place, but I read the
last call discussions because they were on a separate list. I
wouldn't have bothered to, and don't bother to, follow these discussions
when they are held on ietf@xxxxxxxx.
4: I really like it and want to keep it.
-tjs
On 5/1/2020 12:06 PM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
On Fri, 2020-05-01 at 08:35 -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
Overall, I don’t care.
However, sending this thread to the last-call@xxxxxxxx list, seems to
me to defeat the purpose of the last call list. That is, it is to
be used for IETF w.g. last calls. Other discussions, like this one,
should happen on the ietf@xxxxxxxx list.
well, that would exclude users like me from giving feedback, who are
happy to be on <last-call@xxxxxxxx> (for the record: "4") and are not
following <ietf@xxxxxxxx>.
I don't know how many are in my position, but I noted at least this
response from Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>:
4: I really like it and want to keep it.
(In fact, I unsubscribed from ietf@xxxxxxxx)
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
