Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--------
In message <78C9039F-F687-41A1-A85D-CC8B3B82211B@xxxxxxxx>, Mark Nottingham writes:
>On 6 May 2020, at 6:29 am, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>=20
>> In class B people deal with huge numbers by downscaling:  Millions,
>> Trillions, GigaBytes and PetaBytes.  Nobody really cares if the
>> stimulus was 1.000.000.000.000 or 1.000.000.000.010 dollars, so
>> sawing of the right hand side is a good way to make numbers =
>manageable,
>> at the cost of suffixing multiplier: $125M
>
>This makes me wonder whether we should add an example to stimulate =
>readers' imagination in this direction; e.g.,
>
>Example-ScaledInt: 4503;suffix=3DM

Would that work without an explanation ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux