Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
From
: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 07 May 2020 10:02:04 -0700
Cc
: ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
DB82CF2C-C5C5-49A6-B123-175A7BBC60AE@sobco.com
>
References
: <
CAL0qLwbGoLbq+Ho1zxuLCZ6m-L6KJUzbrhaZ+bQh5BHrhpRB_w@mail.gmail.com
> <
DB82CF2C-C5C5-49A6-B123-175A7BBC60AE@sobco.com
>
User-agent
: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
> is there a stated reason to do this? my thought was this will improve the internet how? randy
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
From:
Bob Hinden
References
:
Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
From:
Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
From:
Scott O. Bradner
Prev by Date:
Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
Next by Date:
Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
Previous by thread:
Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
Next by thread:
Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Mhonarc]
[Fedora Users]
