I understand that, however, without knowing the contract text/context with more detail, is difficult to know if it is really needed even to mention any “CDC” or alike organization. Further to that, regardless of the jurisdiction where your contract is based on (I’ve done a few hundreds of contracts in my life), you can, and it may be perfectly fine, use references to other organizations. Note that my comment is not just about US, but in general, just using what we have now. And of course, not trying to micromanage, but I think at least, we have the right to understand those details. Having access to the contracts, which can’t be, in general secret, could clarify many things and the community can provide inputs (not decisions) for the LLC to consider alternatives. I call this contributing to have everyting as best as we can, not micro-managing. El 8/5/20 9:32, "ietf en nombre de Bron Gondwana" <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx en nombre de brong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió: On Fri, May 8, 2020, at 17:06, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
I'm not Jay, but IETF LLC is a US Company, so a US source makes sense. Contracts need to have a jurisdiction on them, and I bet that the jurisdiction is one where the CDC is the authoritative body in legislation. Bron. P.S. maybe we as a community could decide to micromanage ourselves into inability to get anything done. In another thread a while ago I suggested this as the most likely eventual death for the IETF - that we get so caught up navel gazing our own processes that we implode into our own event horizon, Bleak-Housing ourselves all the way to the end. Not that I think we're close to it yet, and maybe it was worse before I joined - I don't have a long organisational memory here! -- Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd brong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. |
