Perhaps not, but a larger int would do the trick. That said, I'm not sure this is worth the late change. Cheers, > On 7 May 2020, at 4:47 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -------- > In message <977F061C-A4BB-413B-B26C-51C7A694FA74@xxxxxxxx>, Mark Nottingham writes: > >> Perhaps in full context: >> >> ~~~ >> For example: >> >> Example-ScaledInt: 4503; suffix=3DM >> >> Could be used to indicate a scaled value; in this case, 4,503,000,000, = >> if the `M` suffix parameter is specified to denote multiplying the = >> integer by 1,000,000. >> ~~~ >> >> Thoughts? > > Would people connect that to the 15 digit limitation ? > > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
