Re: How survey results informed preliminary IETF 108 planning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom:

Check out manycouches@xxxxxxxx

Russ

> On May 22, 2020, at 5:31 AM, tom petch <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Is there any mailiing list on which to raise issues arising from virtual meetings, apart from this one?  I am thinking that this will go way beyond IETF 108 and so will be a long running discussion :-(
> 
> ---
> New Outlook Express and Windows Live Mail replacement - get it here:
> https://www.oeclassic.com/
> 
> The sorts of thing I am wondering about is
> - fees (much asked about in the survey)
> - technology needed to participate (there seems to be a groundswell that there is no good technology, at least not open)
> - I-D cut off, or not
> - POP location (ie cost of connecting)
> - authentication
> and so on
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: IETF Chair <chair@xxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> To: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 21/05/2020 18:55:22
> Subject: How survey results informed preliminary IETF 108 planning
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> A new blog post is up at https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf108-survey-results-informed-planning/ about how we’ve used survey results thus far to inform IETF 108 meeting planning.
> 
> Alissa Cooper
> IETF Chair
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux