On 15.05.2020 18:06, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
--------
In message <4859a11f-5649-b633-f43b-facf036e61c7@xxxxxx>, Julian Reschke writes
:
Related to this: it just occurred to me that:
Test: Foo
Test:
Test: Bar
yields different results for fields using HTTP's list notation, and
structured header fields.
In the former case, the combined value is equivalent to
Test: Foo, Bar
while in the latter case, the field is malformed.
I *really* think it would be better if structured header fields would
actually be "proper" applications of the standard HTTP list ABNF.
Considering how rarely used multiple-headers are (apart from The
Cookie Mistake) I think it would be much simpler, better and wiser
to restrict SH to single, non-concatenated headers.
I have no idea what the exact proposal would be. Fail when multiple
instances are there?
...
Best regards, Julian
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
