Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--------
In message <3aa18f59-889b-bb3e-289d-0936bb18a9a8@xxxxxx>, Julian Reschke writes
:

>I have no idea what the exact proposal would be. Fail when multiple
>instances are there?

That has always been my stance:  Multiple instances of the same
header should have been banned long ago, ideally before the
Cookie-Mistake allowed the total plunder of our privacy.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux