On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 04:06:37PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > In message <4859a11f-5649-b633-f43b-facf036e61c7@xxxxxx>, Julian Reschke writes > >I *really* think it would be better if structured header fields would > >actually be "proper" applications of the standard HTTP list ABNF. > > Considering how rarely used multiple-headers are (apart from The > Cookie Mistake) I think it would be much simpler, better and wiser > to restrict SH to single, non-concatenated headers. > > Ufortunately, that also runs up against the fact that we cannot > possibly know if the header we got was joined by an unwitting > intermediary. Definitely, which is why suggesting that each occurrence must conform is a good compromise which is much easier to enforce at multiple points in the chain. Willy -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
