Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 15:43:58 +0100
Cc: ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAL0qLwbGoLbq+Ho1zxuLCZ6m-L6KJUzbrhaZ+bQh5BHrhpRB_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbGoLbq+Ho1zxuLCZ6m-L6KJUzbrhaZ+bQh5BHrhpRB_w@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.14

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote on 07/05/2020 15:19:

The community is invited to provide comments on this change. We wouldlike to move forward on or after May 31st


Please do.  POP2 hasn't been seen in the wild for decades.

Nick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
  - From: Michael Richardson
- Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
  - From: Christopher Morrow

References:
- Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy

Prev by Date: Re: News about the Internet Society and PIR.
Next by Date: Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
Previous by thread: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
Next by thread: Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux