Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > Murray S. Kucherawy wrote on 07/05/2020 15:19:
    >> The community is invited to provide comments on this change.  We would
    >> like to move forward on or after May 31st

    > Please do.  POP2 hasn't been seen in the wild for decades.

I agree!

Is there a timeline by which port 109 could be reassigned?

Would we just put this at the end of the list of unassigned <1024 ports?
Or is that a separate decision?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux