Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm not comfortable citing an NFSv4 document to define a term used in > a document that discusses a generic RPC transport. To me that feels an > awful lot like a layering violation. If doing that would be a layering violation, then this passage is also a layering violation: To protect backchannel operations, an RPC server uses the existing TLS session on that connection to send backchannel operations. The server does not attempt to establish a TLS session on a TCP connection for backchannel operation. Dale -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
