Re: Marking TCP/UDP Port 109 as "Historic"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/7/20 10:19 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Colleagues,

The IESG has received a request to update the IANA "Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number" registry to mark port 109 (POP2) as "Historic".  The specific changes proposed are as follows:

1) Change the registration's Description field to read "Post Office Protocol - Version 2 (Historic)" 2) Change the Assignee to IESG (with link as shown for SMTP on port 25, for example) 3) Change the Contact to IETF Chair (also with link as shown for SMTP, for example) 4) Change the Assignment Notes to read "Originally registered by Joyce K.. Reynolds in RFC 937 (HIstoric)", with link preserved from the current Assignee/Contact column.

The community is invited to provide comments on this change.  We would like to move forward on or after May 31st, so if you have feedback to provide, please do so by then..

-MSK, ART AD

Since there are very many Historic protocols with port assignments, I propose that IESG be authorized to declare a port assignment Historic without soliciting community input, if the latest version of the protocol specification has already been (re)classified Historic by an IETF Consensus action - (unless the document declaring the specification Historic specifies another disposition for the port).   That way we don't have to have a separate discussion for every such protocol.

However, IMO, ports declared Historic should not be subject to immediate reassignment for other purposes.  Perhaps after 10 years?

Keith





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux