Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Unsurprisingly, I like it. Based on the criteria you give, I'd say 4; it's not perfect (others have already suggested interesting improvements), but it's substantially better than what was before, and we shouldn't go back.

Cheers,


> On 1 May 2020, at 1:15 am, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> (I'm replying to this and adding the last-call list, which I forgot to
> do when I sent it.  Please reply to *this* message, to keep both lists
> included.)
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:00 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> It's been around six months since we started the <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
>> list, and we said that we would evaluate the results after six months.
>> To that end, the IESG would like to see comments about how it's been
>> working.
>> 
>> Please respond to this thread to comment.  It would be helpful if the
>> first line of your comment gave a succinct view of your opinion on the
>> following 5-to-1 scale:
>> 
>> 5: Perfect!  Don't even think about going back!
>> 4: I really like it and want to keep it.
>> 3: Neutral: I don't care either way.
>> 2: I don't like it, but I can live with it if we decide to keep it.
>> 1: It's terrible!  Please, please go back to the old way!
>> 
>> And, of course, if you have further comments beyond those numbers,
>> include those as well.  We want to know what you think.  Comments,
>> please, in the next couple of weeks, by 15 May.  Thanks!
>> 
>> Barry, for the IESG
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux