Barry, IESG,
I'm neutral, either way works for me.
/Loa
On 30/04/2020 23:15, Barry Leiba wrote:
(I'm replying to this and adding the last-call list, which I forgot to
do when I sent it. Please reply to *this* message, to keep both lists
included.)
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:00 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's been around six months since we started the <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
list, and we said that we would evaluate the results after six months.
To that end, the IESG would like to see comments about how it's been
working.
Please respond to this thread to comment. It would be helpful if the
first line of your comment gave a succinct view of your opinion on the
following 5-to-1 scale:
5: Perfect! Don't even think about going back!
4: I really like it and want to keep it.
3: Neutral: I don't care either way.
2: I don't like it, but I can live with it if we decide to keep it.
1: It's terrible! Please, please go back to the old way!
And, of course, if you have further comments beyond those numbers,
include those as well. We want to know what you think. Comments,
please, in the next couple of weeks, by 15 May. Thanks!
Barry, for the IESG
--
My mail server it under a DOS attack, we are working to fix it but it
may take some time.
Loa Andersson email: loa@xxxxx
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
