On 2 Jun 2020, at 15:55, Stephen Farrell wrote:
On 02/06/2020 21:44, Ted Hardie wrote:
You appear to be arguing that moving from zero to any number
for a particular class of participants effectively excludes some of
those
participants from the standards process and because that would be a
standards process change, that would pull it from their bailiwick.
No. I'm arguing that the move from zero to non-zero ought
be an IESG decision, based on community discussion. That's
not only because it might exclude people but also because
such changes can have longer term and subtle effects.
Yep. Ted, would your opinion be different if the LLC chose to move from
zero to non-zero for sending email to mailing lists?
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
