Re: Registration details for IETF 108

[Jay Daley <jay@xxxxxxxx>]

On 2/06/2020, at 10:39 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hiya,

On 01/06/2020 23:14, Jay Daley wrote:

Would it still apply when onsite meetings start to happen ?

No decision has been made about that.

Would it be sensible to promise/ensure that a community
discussion that determines direction, within the bounds
of practicality, precedes, rather than follows, that
decision? FWIW, I think it would and it's important that
that be the case. IOW, let's sort out our approach to
this before the timeframe of IETF109.

It would be excellent if that could happen.

It might or might not be a nit but while the detailed level
of reasonable meeting fee is properly an LLC operational
matter, the distinction between zero vs. non-zero fees for
remote participants is IMO very much not an LLC matter and
definitely does require community consensus.

I would say that it should be covered by community consensus but as it isn’t and we have limited time to plan then it falls on the LLC to fill the gap as an interim measure.  From my perspective the sooner the community provides guidance the better, though I should repeat my suggestion that this discussed in the context of the overall financial structure of the IETF (i.e. what we charge for and why) and how that relates to the aspirations of the IETF for participation, rather than just in the context of meeting finances.

Jay

Cheers,
S.



<0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc>

-- 
Jay Daley

IETF Executive Director
jay@xxxxxxxx