Good catch. We definitely should not be recommending sep256k1.
-Ekr
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 1:30 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I believe that the IESG needs to debate if this document should be the one
which makes the secp256k1 curve a recommended IETF curve to use.
A good point, albeit slightly subtle. +1.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call