Re: [Last-Call] [Captive-portals] Last Call: <draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08.txt> (CAPPORT Architecture) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Martin for raising the issues on git for tracking.

 

Thanks,

Subash

 

From: Martin Thomson <mt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, May 11, 2020 at 3:46 PM
To: "Tirupachur Comerica, Subash" <subash.tirupachurcomerica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "last-call@xxxxxxxx" <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "capport-chairs@xxxxxxxx" <capport-chairs@xxxxxxxx>, "draft-ietf-capport-architecture@xxxxxxxx" <draft-ietf-capport-architecture@xxxxxxxx>, "captive-portals@xxxxxxxx" <captive-portals@xxxxxxxx>, "barryleiba@xxxxxxxxx" <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Last Call: <draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08.txt> (CAPPORT Architecture) to Informational RFC

 

Editors,

 

I've opened a few issues on the comments Subash indicated were still pending.  I think that we can take these as last call comments in the usual fashion.  I don't see a pressing reason to update the draft, but it would be nice if you could take a look at the remaining items to see if there is any action required.

 

On Tue, May 12, 2020, at 03:50, Tirupachur Comerica, Subash wrote:

>  

> Hi,

>

> Sorry, I had sent these comments sometime back, a few are still valid.

>

> Could you please take care of these?

>

>

> Thanks,

>

> Subash

>

>

>

> *From: *"Tirupachur Comerica, Subash" <subash.tirupachurcomerica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> *Date: *Thursday, April 30, 2020 at 4:19 PM

> *To: *"captive-portals@xxxxxxxx" <captive-portals@xxxxxxxx>

> *Subject: *AD review of draft-ietf-capport-architecture-07

>

>

> Hi,

>

> I was reviewing this AD and found a few discrepancy needing

> clarifications, couple of them may just be editorial in nature.

>

> Appreciate your response on this, thanks.

>

>

> Thanks,

>

> Subash

>

>

> *_Section 1.2_*

>

> Captive Network and Captive Portal are used interchangeably, so do we

> define captive portal or network or both? – [Pending]

>

>

> *_Section 2.3_*

>

> At minimum, the API MUST provide: (1) the state of captivity and (2) a

> URI for the Captive Portal Server. – [Pending]

>

> - However, in draft-ietf-capport-api, section 5: API State Structure,

> only "captive" (boolean): is mandatory whereas "user-portal-url"

> (string): is optional. One of these two drafts may need an update for

> consistency.

>

> *_ _*

>

> *_Section 2.6 Component Diagram_*

>

> Although the Provisioning Service, API Server, and Web Portal Server

> functions are shown as discrete blocks, they could of course be

> combined into a single element. – [Pending]

>

> - Here may be we can add the [Captive Portal Enforcement] as well, for

> eg: API Server, Web Portal Server and Enforcement can co-exist on a

> single WiFi Access-Point using ACLs. Also there is a feeble reference

> to this co-location in Section 3.4.1

>

>

> *_Section 3 Captive Portal Signal_*

>

> Is Enforcement Device defined anywhere else? Is it same as Captive

> Portal Enforcement(I guess so) Or does it coordinate with it? –

> [Resolved, Please ignore]

>

>

>

> *From: *Captive-portals <captive-portals-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of

> Bob Harold <rharolde@xxxxxxxxx>

> *Date: *Monday, May 11, 2020 at 10:35 AM

> *To: *"last-call@xxxxxxxx" <last-call@xxxxxxxx>

> *Cc: *"capport-chairs@xxxxxxxx" <capport-chairs@xxxxxxxx>,

> "draft-ietf-capport-architecture@xxxxxxxx"

> <draft-ietf-capport-architecture@xxxxxxxx>, "captive-portals@xxxxxxxx"

> <captive-portals@xxxxxxxx>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx>,

> "barryleiba@xxxxxxxxx" <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxx>, Martin Thomson

> <mt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> *Subject: *Re: [Captive-portals] Last Call:

> <draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08.txt> (CAPPORT Architecture) to

> Informational RFC

>

>

>

> I am curious why section 3.4 does not consider the MAC Address as a

> possible identifier?

>

>

> --

>

> Bob Harold

>

>

>

> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:56 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>

> >

> >  The IESG has received a request from the Captive Portal Interaction WG

> >  (capport) to consider the following document: - 'CAPPORT Architecture'

> >  <draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08.txt> as Informational RFC

> >

> >  The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final

> >  comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the

> > last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-05-25. Exceptionally, comments may

> >  be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning

> >  of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

> >

> >  Abstract

> >

> >

> >  This document describes a CAPPORT architecture. DHCP or Router

> >  Advertisements, an optional signaling protocol, and an HTTP API are

> >  used to provide the solution. The role of Provisioning Domains

> >  (PvDs) is described.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >  The file can be obtained via

> > https://secure-web.cisco.com/15YygQHy-oelEGxcEL3bc0yBY6TF-VHfruXSf6FPzYwSgtjpWCr1CgRye3VNWf1t9h-rWjEyoiCxycEbzgM4E2NX6heccQhCGsh8UpqqgGoYguA10Fyv5zEaaY80-zR3SK6eFYcDZpb4FE7D-PjMtnB0PdF7JJeg-ehHQj3Bg-GVchuCNAJdJ_hgIDlcJUdmg5RokTl4EJSydiSNpHG6yfIuuR-hpfrPa64iMiOQDnAkCqg5GG092jgTsF6_hADsUFyvYISWUz7juEs-lovsptJ8dtWW2Y4IOMt5V9P6ltN99kIu9BbuE8DkobpGjYdizEJnK5BVTJB8KL9zjHNwjSg/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-capport-architecture%2F <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1yVzqJ3UqY3xwLQUGHinMzu-7twa12PiLIN7EN50B62FLD0cXno02n3f_Qw7DSpKpG96CA7TKBLzu9xzC6TVQejhSfGo-jrF8DNmSa3LVszDOuk89O1tF28heTpZxo-Zl4Kzk3DxQoD5Hc8fDnwaLz69x04aBTgzTGR2Tf9ZMouiJgl4PjT97QOV7tu7viXpNVyNfM-2molaELtIJWJd00DqIJTzR2Hap7yETyceSjQTihOQh7tPi056W8nOWCQ-MxwbxsGzR5V37Soo1SFiKSaR_KHKYhK_NLd4ys-MQ_bKZmZiS_YEiEQX_q0lLjmFgTrqjGvQxzlOj0gwI4zthZQ/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-capport-architecture%2F>

> >

> >

> >

> >  No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >  _______________________________________________

> >  Captive-portals mailing list

> > Captive-portals@xxxxxxxx

> > https://secure-web.cisco.com/19JFZdBEW3HbgyKwfA6173s7J4a8zv5vvOztdE6iJlssKD4bNLfbi87gxYkoUIM_JpR112JGLqAnoNvRQTPm_lFpjezWRmZbHWUG2W4a1rVp9pRqnmS3asoPidUlFdVnuWBehpP4bld0n-HIRQ3QKvS4L_oZEyJHQp3WjrtEhnSd9bGg65vt5vBwfsjUY1G5Ji_n7wK_ro1WD5v0G4jJdoOdjcCqgTQmAjwW0BVJLHSuBeb_2W7SCvM7_0jjZKOJu7zXXoEPGvYKjk288nQ0ipH4jU8xcvSLA_QX1BO6tAqbnL3btzMXt8UkZKuTEjAnlK73wIBUdJyacSwj5W-IUumL5GKDz-I66wHZKHqTV0ZM/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcaptive-portals <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1luUyQqfEnnX25r5RvmYXc4O6JMe744dFK_VSJQto5cvtJVqN7Y0Ie7SkRZBkDnAUWnL8L3b4ifd7pTzCT-EsrZmZhOLnLmd_gJDefmDNmw8a8wnbkHiR12asEIcSP9COhQWmnSY75DStoZ7N9Bidi67LQuNxiFexwf8r9J6F6QHrpMpgDgnqiyNKBaJcIC6GmF8UsF3j95f2eFjpdr_0ttHQuXj_XrxTJebBxaS3EdYg8OZsH713lH0DH-VYJ0a_IXiATDxiGaA7gvKppncYKLUo1Pi-xZ7HgL6prLTkzjLEwRFRGlYdkwrDLKV6zUZcbT23_4lyApm-XMaOQo4KZEFyQOebJB-U33Nrqn2nO7w/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcaptive-portals>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Captive-portals mailing list

> Captive-portals@xxxxxxxx

> https://secure-web.cisco.com/19JFZdBEW3HbgyKwfA6173s7J4a8zv5vvOztdE6iJlssKD4bNLfbi87gxYkoUIM_JpR112JGLqAnoNvRQTPm_lFpjezWRmZbHWUG2W4a1rVp9pRqnmS3asoPidUlFdVnuWBehpP4bld0n-HIRQ3QKvS4L_oZEyJHQp3WjrtEhnSd9bGg65vt5vBwfsjUY1G5Ji_n7wK_ro1WD5v0G4jJdoOdjcCqgTQmAjwW0BVJLHSuBeb_2W7SCvM7_0jjZKOJu7zXXoEPGvYKjk288nQ0ipH4jU8xcvSLA_QX1BO6tAqbnL3btzMXt8UkZKuTEjAnlK73wIBUdJyacSwj5W-IUumL5GKDz-I66wHZKHqTV0ZM/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcaptive-portals

> 

 

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux