IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: snarls in real life, (continued)
- L3 RFC draft help,
Aqua Q Glass
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06,
Timothy Winters via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08.txt> (A YANG Grouping for Geographic Locations) to Proposed Standard,
Erik Kline
- [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06,
Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 18 06:00:02 2021,
John Levine
- San Francisco?,
Marc Petit-Huguenin
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-09,
Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
- New-comers,
Ole Jacobsen
- New Approach For Discussing IPv10.,
Khaled Omar
- Proposed Process to Conduct Assessment Activity of IETF Administrative Support Activity,
IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors Chair
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11,
Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10,
Peter Van der Stok via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06,
Martin Björklund via Datatracker
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
John Levine
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Salz, Rich
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Bron Gondwana
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Eliot Lear
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Jim Fenton
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Nico Williams
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
John Levine
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Stephen Farrell
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Dan Harkins
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Warren Kumari
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Keith Moore
- New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program),
Andrew Sullivan
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program),
John C Klensin
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program),
Ole Jacobsen
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program),
John C Klensin
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program),
Michael Thomas
- What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers),
Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers),
Leif Johansson
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Leif Johansson
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Leif Johansson
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Christian Huitema
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Clint Chaplin
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Leif Johansson
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Michael Thomas
- RE: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Larry Masinter
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Michael Thomas
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Randy Presuhn
- Message not available
- adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools (was: What's the alternative to "snarling"?),
Keith Moore
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Lloyd W
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Keith Moore
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
John Levine
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Nick Hilliard
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Keith Moore
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Salz, Rich
- RE: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Larry Masinter
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Fred Baker
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Martin J. Dürst
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Nick Hilliard
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Jay Daley
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Eliot Lear
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools,
Lloyd W
- Message not available
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Leif Johansson
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Dave Cridland
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Dave Cridland
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Michael Thomas
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Salz, Rich
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Salz, Rich
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Lloyd W
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Jay Daley
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Jay Daley
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?,
Leif Johansson
- RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Warren Kumari
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Wes Hardaker
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous,
Fernando Gont
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Livingood, Jason
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
S Moonesamy
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
tom petch
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Fernando Gont
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Nico Williams
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Salz, Rich
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
Ofer Inbar
[Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-03,
Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10,
Tero Kivinen via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09,
Ron Bonica via Datatracker
Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard,
tom petch
[Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-06,
Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker
[ot] Fwd: [ann] publictext,
Petite Abeille
Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 11 06:00:02 2021,
John Levine
Quic: the elephant in the room,
Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Ben Laurie
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Viktor Dukhovni
- DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room),
Keith Moore
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room),
Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room),
Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Keith Moore
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Petite Abeille
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
John C Klensin
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Keith Moore
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Keith Moore
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Keith Moore
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
John Levine
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Mark Andrews
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
John R Levine
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Nico Williams
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Donald Eastlake
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Vittorio Bertola
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Nico Williams
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Michael Thomas
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Andrew McConachie
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality,
Marco Davids
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Nico Williams
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Michael Thomas
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Salz, Rich
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room,
Phillip Hallam-Baker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room,
Lars Eggert
[Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-10,
Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09,
Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-12,
Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
[Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam,
Dan Harkins
IETF Annual Report 2020,
IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors Chair
[Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25,
Tim Chown via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04,
Theresa Enghardt via Datatracker
Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard,
Daniel Franke
[Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-06,
Ines Robles via Datatracker
Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA,
IETF Sergeant at Arms
[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11,
Dale Worley via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-06,
Ron Bonica via Datatracker
TERM chartering and the April incidents,
lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 4 06:00:04 2021,
John Levine
[Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-07,
Melinda Shore via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11,
Al Morton via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-14,
Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-09,
Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
[Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-07,
Russ Housley via Datatracker
WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term),
S Moonesamy
A contribution to ongoing terminology work,
lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IP Storage]
[Linux SCTP]
[IETF]
