RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Larry,

 

Per our datatracker info you’re qualified via both Path 1 and Path 3 (RFC8989).

 

If you still believe you may not be qualified for some reason, please let me know.

 

Thanks,

 

Gabriel

 

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Larry Masinter
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2021 16:53
To: NomCom-chair-2021@xxxxxxxx
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom

 

Unfortunately, after reviewing RFC 8989, I think there may be an issue with my qualifications.

At the 110 meeting, although I was registered (and got the T-shirt, thank you) I was unable to attend any working group meeting or plenary session. (Mainly time-zone issues).

I did try gather.town but didn’t find anyone to talk to.

 

Personally, I liked the idea of being on the nomcom after so many years, but perhaps reviewing actual participation (even just asking each volunteer to assert actual participation) might bring the process closer to its intent.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux