Joel M. Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> While I agree we probably have the time to reopen it, we can't just
> decide to do so. We can't simply change the procedures because we want
> to (particularly note when "we" is some vocal subset of the community.)
I agree.
> Look folks, I am not happy with the lack of diversity. But the
> solution to that was to get folks to volunteer. I didn't push as hard
> as I should have. Probably because I do not htink chair pushing helps
> much. But I did forward the announcement to remind folks. To all three
> of my working groups. I doubt it mattered.
I think that the best way to "push" is where it goes through company internal email
from the CTO or whomever pays for IETF attendance.
I wonder if some people volunteer, hoping that it will mean that they'll
"have" to travel to IETF.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
